which ONE of the three branches is the most powerful and influential today?

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Answer:

The Cuban Missile Crisis is an example of the constant standoff between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War.

The Soviets agreed to remove the missiles from Cuba when the United States agreed to remove their own missiles from Turkey.

The United States quarantined, surrounded, Cuba using military vessels.

The Soviet Union placing missiles in Cuba that threatened the United States.

Explanation:

The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 was a direct and dangerous confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War and was the moment when the two superpowers came closest to nuclear conflict.

Answer:

Explanation:

The global battle known as World War I lasted from 1914 until 1918. The reasons of the conflict were intricate and numerous, although they may generally be linked to a variety of interrelated issues, such as the establishment of European alliances, imperialism, nationalism, and militarism.

The development of European alliances was one of the major factors that led to World War I. Several European nations made alliances with one another in the years preceding the war in an effort to bolster their positions in the event of conflict. The Triple Alliance between Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy and the Triple Entente between Great Britain, France, and Russia were the most significant of these partnerships.

The buildup to World War I was also significantly influenced by imperialism.Several European nations had imperial aspirations and tried to enlarge their spheres of influence and dominion. As a result, there was fierce rivalry for resources and lands, especially in Africa and Asia. Conflicts and rivalry between European nations were frequently caused by the battle for colonies and markets.

In the years leading up to the conflict, nationalism also played a part. Several European nations saw the rise of nationalist groups as people fought to defend their national identities and interests. This increased hostilities between various national groups, especially in areas like the Balkans where they coexisted in precarious balance.

And last, militarism was a significant contributor to World War I.Each European state that wanted to keep its position of power and reputation made significant investments in its military forces. As a result, there was a competition to develop the most advanced military technologies and capabilities among various nations. The militarization of Europe increased the likelihood of violence and made it more challenging to settle disputes peacefully.

Together, these elements produced a very unstable environment in Europe that ultimately sparked the start of World War I. The trigger event that started the war was the murder of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by a Serbian nationalist in June 1914, although the underlying factors had been accumulating for a long time.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

the current balance is atleast high levels of the terrorist threats in the US and all around the world while also protecting the individual rights of the people 60% of it is on the individual rights and the 40% is on the terrorist threats

Answer:

Primary sources are firsthand, while secondary sources are made secondhand

Explanation:

firsthand meaning by someone who was there to experience an event and recorded the experience (diary, autobiography, voice recording)

secondhand meaning by someone who is telling the account of another person when they didn't experience it themselves (biography, a movie based on true events)

Although the colonists suffered a heavy defeat at Bunker Hill, it also demonstrated to the British that they were prepared to fight and were capable of holding their own. Although they were able to take the hill, the British incurred significant losses in the process, which had a negative impact on their spirits.

Due to a substantial colonial victory, the Battle of Saratoga marked a turning point in the Revolutionary War. The colonists' morale was raised as a result of the British being forced to surrender, and they also received crucial French backing.

The tactics used in these battles provide insight into the differences between the colonists and the British. While the British liked to battle in broad fields in traditional formation, the colonists depended on guerilla tactics like hiding behind buildings and trees and firing at the British from cover.

This demonstrates the colonists' ability to adapt and employ novel tactics in conflict as well as their capacity to make use of their familiarity with the environment. The British, on the other hand, were less willing to adjust to the shifting conditions and were more dogmatic in their approach to battle.

learn more about independence from Britain here

https://brainly.com/question/1410857

#SPJ1

FEMA or the Federal Emergency Management Agency, was created in 1979 to help prepare for and respond to the disasters in the United States.

Disasters refer to events that cause significant harm and disruption to human lives, infrastructure, and the environment. They can be natural, such as earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, and wildfires, or human-made, such as industrial accidents, terrorist attacks, and civil unrest. Disasters can result in the loss of lives, displacement of people, damage to property and infrastructure, disruption of essential services, and the spread of diseases. They can have long-term economic, social, and environmental consequences. Disasters can be mitigated through preparedness measures such as risk assessments, emergency planning, and public education. Effective response and recovery efforts involve coordination and collaboration between government agencies, civil society organizations, and communities to restore normalcy and build resilience.

To learn more about disasters, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28991652

#SPJ1

Due to the region's more diverse economy, it was typical for individual enslaved individuals in New England to master specialized skills and trades. In order to administer their families and help them out at work, ministers, physicians, business owners, and tradespeople also employed slave labor.

What were the main reasons for slavery?

European traders were drawn to West Africa by its commercial riches like ivory and gold. Slaves in West Africa rose to prominence as the most valuable 'commodity' for European traders as the desire for cheap labour to work on plantations in the Americas increased. Before the arrival of the Europeans, slavery existed throughout Africa.

Slavery has been practised historically in a variety of ways, including as property, in bonds, as forced labor, and as sexual slavery.

Throughout the whole colonial era, slaves were imported into New England, and until the American Revolution, slavery was practised in all of the colonies. Most slaves lived at least part of their lives as slaves and were frequently purchased as young children in coastal cities.

Learn more about slave in New England:

https://brainly.com/question/3568353

#SPJ1

Answer: war production board

D. Smoot-Hawley Tariffs was NOT a way in which the federal government tried to impact the economy during the war and combat inflation. The Smoot-Hawley Tariffs were passed in 1930 and were aimed at protecting American industries from foreign competition, but they are widely considered to have worsened the Great Depression. By the time the U.S. entered World War II, the government had shifted its focus to policies aimed at stimulating the economy and supporting the war effort.

Answer:

It is worth noting that the governance of the city state of Venice during its history was complex and involved various groups, including merchants and the Catholic Church. The role and influence of different groups in Venice's government varied over time, and different individuals and factions had different perspectives on what was best for the city and its people. Ultimately, the effectiveness and legitimacy of a government depend on many factors, including the competence and integrity of its leaders, the quality of its institutions, and the support and participation of its citizens.

On the early morning of 31 January 1968, as phase of the Tet Offensive, 19 Viet Cong sappers from the elite C-10 Sapper Battalion attacked the embassy.

The sensationalist and tendentious media insurance of the failed Tet offensive, on the other hand, helped turn public opinion towards the administration's battle effort and led a majority of Americans to reject its claims of progress, despite all proof to the contrary. Commanding General William C.

On this day in 1968, as section of the Tet Offensive, a squad of Viet Cong guerillas assaults the U.S. Embassy in Saigon. The soldiers seized the embassy and held it for six hours until an assault force of U.S. paratroopers landed with the aid of helicopter on the building's roof and routed the Viet Cong.

Learn more about  Tet Offensive here:

So essentially the question is: How can the state government go against the federal government?

The given information leaves no area for the passage but I can mildly infer what you mean.

To start:

So, constitutionally speaking, the States have more rights than the federal government.

We didn’t start out with a country which was then divided up into states.

Instead, we started out with states that all agreed to have a Federal Government that was given limited powers by those states. The states reserved the right of veto over many things the Federal Government might do. In fact, when the Confederation of Southern States decided to secede from the Union before the Civil War, they were prevented from doing so not because seceeding was unconstitutional (it wasn’t), but because the Federal Government went to war with the Southern States under president Abraham Lincoln and re-captured those lands with the same expansionist mindset that was used to take away the land of Native Americans in the Westward growth of this country. That Civil War resulted in more American deaths than WWI and WWII combined.

It is the nature of government to assume a necessity and right of top-down absolute control over everything and everyone of it’s subjects. The US Constitution was set up to prevent that, but most people who enter government are soon infatuated and addicted to power and our constitution has been chipped away at ever since. It is not so much that the written text of the constitution has been changed legally and voted on, but that a combination of lawmakers and judges throughout history have simply ignored the Constitution.

Thanks.

#SPJ1

Answer: Consumption + Investment + Government spending

Explanation:

After World War 2, Texas underwent many changes, and one change was a huge increase in the state's population.

Population refers to the total number of individuals or organisms of a particular species living within a specific geographical area or region. It is a fundamental concept in ecology, demographics, and social sciences. The size and characteristics of a population are determined by various factors, including birth and death rates, migration patterns, and environmental factors such as resource availability and climate. Population size and growth rate have significant implications for social, economic, and environmental issues, such as urbanization, healthcare, food security, and biodiversity conservation. Understanding population dynamics is crucial for sustainable development and effective policy-making, particularly in the context of global challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and human health.

To learn more about population, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30781042

#SPJ1

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The battle began on April 16 when the Soviets attacked along the Oder River near Berlin. They quickly defeated the German forces outside Berlin and advanced on the city. By April 20th the Soviets began bombing Berlin. They worked their way around the city and had it completely surrounded in a few days.

A. The women are pointing and C. It looks like there are guards and judges, as well as a jury. These are the evidences from image that  supports the fact that this image is of a trial.

Hence, options A. and C. are the right choice.

A judicial hearing to decide the outcome of a specific case is known as a trial. For example-Should your cousin be detained for taking her neighbor's dog, she may face a Trial.

A trial is when parties to a disagreement gather together to submit information as evidence in a formal setting, often a court, before a judge, jury, or another authority tasked by law with finding a fact, in an effort to resolve their conflict.

To know more about Trial visit:

https://brainly.com/question/249570

#SPJ1

The complete question is-

What evidence supports the fact that this image is of a trial? Check all of the boxes that apply. ( The image is added below)

A. The women are pointing.

B. The women are wearing white hats.

C. It looks like there are guards and judges, as well as a jury.

Answer:

hope it helps :)

Explanation:

The process of industrialization brought about a dramatic social transformation during the 19th century because it fundamentally changed the way people lived and worked. Before the Industrial Revolution, most people lived in small rural communities and engaged in agricultural or craft-based activities.

Words and visuals in the first cartoon include: Hybrid cars, health care, refinancing and the visuals include a mall, the text boxes, and the environment.

In the second picture, we can see one big and one small persons. In the text box, there is a message: You realize this means war.

The first cartoon relates to domestic policy because it deals with issues that affect a nationa dn its people.

Some of these issues are healthcare, and finance. In the second picture we can see the subject of foreign policy as war often involves different nations.

Learn more about domestic and foreign policies here:

https://brainly.com/question/1258683

#SPJ1

Answer:

L'impérialisme peut être défini comme une politique d'expansion territoriale et d'influence politique et économique sur d'autres nations et peuples. Cette politique a été motivée par différents arguments, notamment économiques, humains, stratégiques et moraux. Certains ont justifié l'impérialisme en affirmant qu'il était rentable, que la domination était la nature humaine, que cela garantissait la sécurité régionale ou que c'était une façon de propager une religion. Cependant, d'autres ont critiqué cette politique en affirmant que c'était une forme de domination et d'exploitation qui nuisait aux peuples soumis. Ils ont également souligné les effets négatifs sur la culture et la société des nations dominées. En fin de compte, l'impérialisme peut être considéré comme une politique et une condition à la fois positives et négatives, en fonction des motivations, des méthodes et des conséquences. Dans cet essai, je vais soutenir que l'impérialisme est généralement une politique négative en raison des conséquences néfastes pour les peuples dominés, mais que dans certains cas, il peut être considéré comme positif, par exemple lorsque les peuples dominés bénéficient d'une modernisation bénéfique, d'une meilleure gouvernance et de protections accrues contre les conflits. Pour illustrer mon point de vue, je vais examiner plusieurs exemples d'impérialisme dans l'histoire, tels que le colonialisme européen en Afrique, l'impérialisme japonais en Asie et l'expansion américaine dans les Caraïbes et en Amérique latine.

Explanation:

Answer: #3 = African American men voted in the 1872 presidential election. her u go!!

Answer: very true jesus how much there is. its crazy

Explanation:

While Confederate soldiers marched by, Barbara Frietchie flew a Union flag.

According to Barbara Fritchie's tale, as Confederate troops advanced into Union territory and drew near a particular town, the men there took down the Union flags that were flying out of concern for retaliation.

Barbara Fritchie would have none of that, so she: went outside and flew the Union flag; rebuked General "Stonewall" Jackson for trying to convince her to take it down by reminding him that it was the flag of the United States and that he must respect it; and went back inside and lowered the Union flag. She requested that no soldier take the flag down, and General Jackson complied.

To learn more about Barbara Fritchie, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/2720323

Answer:

Yo, the Santa Fe Trail was a trade route back in the day, connectin' Mexico with Missouri, man. So the answer is D. Missouri, bro!

Answer: D.Missouri

Explanation:

Missouri is where it started and Mexico is where it ended.

After more than 300 years of Spanish colonial control, the Filipino independence war known as the Philippine Revolution (1896–1888) exposed the country's frailties.

Spanish officials uncovered the "Katipunan," a Filipino revolutionary society plotting against their colonizers, in 1896, which ignited the revolt against Spain. It came to an end in 1902 when Spain lost and gave the United States dominion over the Philippines.

The Philippines did not have a distinct national identity when the Spanish arrived in 1565. Instead, the archipelago was made up of hundreds of areas inhabited by various tribal groups that engaged in conflict and commerce with one another. It was already a significant crossroads for trade and culture.

To know more about Philippines revolution visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/2623828

#SPJ1

The decision by President Carter to boycott the 1980 Moscow Olympics is controversial and complex, with arguments on both sides.

On the positive side:

• It showed moral support for the U.S. boycott of the Olympics in protest of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Some saw it as a principled stand against Soviet aggression.

• It may have irritated the Soviet Union and weakened their prestige on the world stage by having a conspicuous absence of U.S. athletes at the games.

• It boosted patriotism and national pride in the U.S. for standing up to the Soviets.

However, there are also criticisms and downsides to consider:

• It likely did little to actually influence the Soviet presence or policies in Afghanistan. The boycott did not force the Soviets to withdraw.

• It denied U.S. athletes the chance to compete on the world stage and possibly win medals. This disappointed many American athletes and sports fans.

• It damaged relations with U.S. allies who did not support the boycott, creating diplomatic tensions.

• It gave the impression that the U.S. was capitulating to Soviet demands by compromising Olympic participation over foreign policy concerns.

• There is little evidence the boycott put meaningful economic or political pressure on the Soviet system. The Soviets seemed largely dismissive of it.

So in summary, while the boycott boosted morale at home, it likely had little practical impact on Soviet actions or policies. It made a statement but did not substantially change realities on the ground. The decision remains polarizing, with reasonable positions on both sides regarding its effectiveness and consequences. Ultimately, its positive or negative impact depends a lot on one's perspective.